HERMITAGE – The TSSAA Legislative Council met on Monday, March 3, at the TSSAA office building in Hermitage to discuss potential changes to the Transfer Rule and Residence Rule. The Council approved a new transfer policy, allowing student-athletes one free transfer without losing eligibility if the move is unrelated to athletics. The proposal passed in an 8-4 vote and permits transfers for significant academic, social-emotional, environmental, or mental health reasons, provided the sending school confirms it is not for athletic or disciplinary motives.

As an addition to Article II, Section 13 regarding Eligible Transfer Students, the Council formally stated: "The first time the student transfers to another school due to a significant academic, social-emotional, environmental, or mental health need. The sending school’s administration must attest that the move is not for athletic or disciplinary reasons."

The decision follows ongoing discussions between the TSSAA and state lawmakers, who are considering legislation that would further loosen transfer restrictions. The bill’s sponsors believe the new policy falls short of their legislation’s goals but have indicated they would withdraw the bill if further adjustments are made to align with it.

The previous TSSAA bylaw mandated a one-year ineligibility period for transfers outside a student’s zone unless accompanied by a legitimate change of address. Last month, the Legislative Council overwhelmingly rejected an unrestricted one-time transfer proposal that aligned with the state lawmakers’ bill.

In addition to the transfer rule change, the Council modified the Residence Rule, stating that international students who have completed secondary school requirements in their country of origin will no longer be eligible for athletics in Tennessee. Other possible changes to the residency rule were discussed but tabled until the April meeting.

The TSSAA plans to revisit the policy next month to clarify verification procedures. After using the one-time transfer, further eligibility concerns will require a formal appeal under the hardship rule.